Abstract
Multiplex Thinking introduces a stochastic soft reasoning mechanism that samples multiple candidate tokens at each step to optimize reasoning trajectories with reinforcement learning while maintaining shorter sequences than traditional chain-of-thought methods.
Large language models often solve complex reasoning tasks more effectively with Chain-of-Thought (CoT), but at the cost of long, low-bandwidth token sequences. Humans, by contrast, often reason softly by maintaining a distribution over plausible next steps. Motivated by this, we propose Multiplex Thinking, a stochastic soft reasoning mechanism that, at each thinking step, samples K candidate tokens and aggregates their embeddings into a single continuous multiplex token. This preserves the vocabulary embedding prior and the sampling dynamics of standard discrete generation, while inducing a tractable probability distribution over multiplex rollouts. Consequently, multiplex trajectories can be directly optimized with on-policy reinforcement learning (RL). Importantly, Multiplex Thinking is self-adaptive: when the model is confident, the multiplex token is nearly discrete and behaves like standard CoT; when it is uncertain, it compactly represents multiple plausible next steps without increasing sequence length. Across challenging math reasoning benchmarks, Multiplex Thinking consistently outperforms strong discrete CoT and RL baselines from Pass@1 through Pass@1024, while producing shorter sequences. The code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/GMLR-Penn/Multiplex-Thinking.
Community
Large language models often solve complex reasoning tasks more effectively with Chain-of-Thought (CoT), but at the cost of long, low-bandwidth token sequences. Humans, by contrast, often reason softly by maintaining a distribution over plausible next steps. Motivated by this, we propose Multiplex Thinking, a stochastic soft reasoning mechanism that, at each thinking step, samples K candidate tokens and aggregates their embeddings into a single continuous multiplex token. This preserves the vocabulary embedding prior and the sampling dynamics of standard discrete generation, while inducing a tractable probability distribution over multiplex rollouts. Consequently, multiplex trajectories can be directly optimized with on-policy reinforcement learning (RL). Importantly, Multiplex Thinking is self-adaptive: when the model is confident, the multiplex token is nearly discrete and behaves like standard CoT; when it is uncertain, it compactly represents multiple plausible next steps without increasing sequence length. Across challenging math reasoning benchmarks, Multiplex Thinking consistently outperforms strong discrete CoT and RL baselines from Pass@1 through Pass@1024, while producing shorter sequences. The code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/GMLR-Penn/Multiplex-Thinking.
arXivlens breakdown of this paper ๐ https://arxivlens.com/PaperView/Details/multiplex-thinking-reasoning-via-token-wise-branch-and-merge-7646-8a4aaca9
- Executive Summary
- Detailed Breakdown
- Practical Applications
arXiv explained breakdown of this paper ๐ https://arxivexplained.com/papers/multiplex-thinking-reasoning-via-token-wise-branch-and-merge
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- ORION: Teaching Language Models to Reason Efficiently in the Language of Thought (2025)
- Reinforcement Learning for Latent-Space Thinking in LLMs (2025)
- ConMax: Confidence-Maximizing Compression for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (2026)
- Efficient Paths and Dense Rewards: Probabilistic Flow Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026)
- Understanding and Steering the Cognitive Behaviors of Reasoning Models at Test-Time (2025)
- ENTRA: Entropy-Based Redundancy Avoidance in Large Language Model Reasoning (2026)
- Reasoning Palette: Modulating Reasoning via Latent Contextualization for Controllable Exploration for (V)LMs (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper