<｜begin▁of▁sentence｜>### Instruction:
Imagine we have two separate sets of puzzles, each representing a unique layout of connected pieces. The first puzzle, let's refer to it as Puzzle A, consists of pieces connected in the following way: piece 1 links to piece 2, piece 2 to pieces 3 and 4, creating a branching shape. The second puzzle, which we'll call Puzzle B, has its pieces arranged thus: piece 5 connects to piece 8 as well as piece 6, and piece 6 connects further to piece 7, forming a structure with a similar branching pattern.

In a manner akin to how we might approach the development of communication strategies for individuals, we need to ascertain if there's a way these two puzzles can be seen as reflections of the same underlying pattern despite the different labels on the pieces. Is there a one-to-one correspondence between the pieces of Puzzle A and Puzzle B that shows they are essentially the same in structure?

Please consider this scenario while maintaining the essence of the original question regarding the possibility of an identical configuration between the two tree structures represented by the puzzles, without changing the nature of the inquiry itself.
### Response:
import networkx as nx

# Given two undirected trees t1 and t2

# Create the first tree
t1 = nx.Graph()
t1.add_edges_from([(1, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4)])

# Create the second tree
t2 = nx.Graph()
t2.add_edges_from([(5, 6), (6, 7), (5, 8)])

# Find the isomorphism between trees
isomorphism = nx.algorithms.tree_isomorphism(t1, t2)

print(isomorphism)
<|EOT|>
