<｜begin▁of▁sentence｜>### Instruction:
As you delve into the intricate tapestry of a family tree, consider the connections between relatives as pathways that can weave through generations. Imagine you have a set of relationships that form links such as [(Parent A, Child B), (Child B, Grandchild C), (Parent A, Grandchild C), (Grandchild C, Great Grandchild D), (Great Grandchild D, Great Great Grandchild E)], symbolizing the lineage bonds.

In genealogical research, it's crucial to ensure the resilience of these connections. For the robustness of the family history narrative, can you verify that for each ancestral link there exists at least one alternative route, akin to an edge-disjoint path, that spans no more than three generations connecting the same individuals? This would signify that each pair connected directly has another way of being related through the family network within a three-step lineage distance, ensuring that the connection is not isolated.

As you weave these stories and strengthen the branches of the family tree, preserving this interconnectedness gives a richer, more secure tapestry reflecting the families' lore and legacy.
### Response:
import networkx as nx

# Create a graph
G = nx.Graph()
G.add_edges_from([(1, 2), (2, 3), (1, 3), (3, 4), (4, 5)])

# Check if the graph is locally (k,l)-connected
# Here k is maximum path length and l is number of edge-disjoint paths needed
k = 3
l = 1
low_memory = False
is_connected = nx.is_kl_connected(G, k, l, low_memory)

print(f'Is the graph locally ({k},{l})-connected? {is_connected}')
<|EOT|>
